Re: Possible regression in teTeX due to license problems: Please check whether your package is affected
- To: debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org
- Cc: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
- Subject: Re: Possible regression in teTeX due to license problems: Please check whether your package is affected
- From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:07:45 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 86y7rz13xa.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
- In-reply-to: <871wptw8uh.fsf@gismo.pca.it> (Luca Capello's message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:41:10 +0200")
- References: <86hcz4hvra.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <871wptw8uh.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Please cc: me on reply, I'm not subscribed to the d-tex-maint list (I
> set M-F-T and R-T accordingly).
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:43:37 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Summary:
>>
>> We will probably have to remove files from teTeX due to license
>> problems: Please check whether your package is affected!
> [...]
>> Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
>
> I'm not a Tex expert, so I'll probably need some help to sort this
> out. Below the situation of my packages.
>
>> parenscript
>
> This package suggests tetex-bin and tetex-extra if you want to have
> the documentation on different PDF files.
I've checked the generated LaTeX code. Except for the minor bug I just
reported, it is okay, and doesn't need any license-problematic files.
>> qbook
>
> This one suggests tetex-bin if the end user wants to produce LaTeX
> documents instead of HTML one. At least in this case I don't think
> there's a problem with the suggestion.
This one creates amazingly simple LaTeX code, no external files are
needed at all. Consequently it's safe, too.
Thanks for contacting us,
Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Reply to: