Bug#380227: texlive-bin: Why is the source in a tar.bz archive?
On Fre, 29 Sep 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> Furthermore, I think having the sources unpacked in the orig.tar.gz
> doesn't even contradict the goal of being able to drop the debian
> directory onto the DVD. Isn't is sufficient to just include
> unpack-stamp in the generated orig.tar.gz (and of course the actual
> unpacked hierarchy)? The dependency of patch-stamp on unpack-stamp will
> still be there, and if there's nothing yet unpacked, it will just be
> done.
Good idea. You convinced me. Especially since I concur with you on the
source problem ;-)
> However, let me add a word of caution. I will probably have to reduce
> my involvement in Debian TeX work in the near future: I'm looking for a
> new job, in industry instead of at the university, and I guess this will
Ah, finally the time has come. I wish you all the best in your search.
You know what David found ... a PostDoc in Statistics, I hope you make
it better.
> The same applies for some other suggestions with respect to texlive
> packaging that I have in mind, but not yet found time to write them
> down.
Please take your time and write it down...
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Università di Siena
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABERCRAVE (vb.)
To strongly desire to swing from the pole on the rear footplate of a
bus.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: