Hi, Frank Küster <frank@kuesterei.ch> wrote: > What's missing is a license. Since teTeX as a compilation is under GPL, > I suggest to use the GPL as well. If anybody objects, I would as well > be happy with something BSDish. Again, please take the time for a short > "Yes, please use the GPL" or a "no" answer, and a signed e-mail if > possible. The GPL is fine with me. More precisely, any of these are fine with me: * GPL v2 * GPL v2 or any later version (for projects of mine, I usually use "GPL v2" because I know I'll be able to change it myself to a later version of the GPL if/when I agree with that version, but for works where many people are involved, there is always the risk that someone becomes unreachable, so I tend to think that "GPL >= 2" is an acceptable compromise in these cases) I'm also open to other DFSG-free licenses, if need be. -- Florent
Attachment:
pgpxJpaOIoydy.pgp
Description: PGP signature