[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#387624: texlive-doc-de: move echem.sty outside doc package



Package: texlive-doc-de
Version: 2005.dfsg.1-1
Severity: wishlist

There is a useful .sty file in a documentation package, but would like to see
that .sty file available to latex.

# dpkg -L texlive-doc-de | grep echem
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc-de/german/latex-tipps-und-tricks/echem.sty
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc-de/german/latex-tipps-und-tricks/echem.tex
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc-de/german/latex-tipps-und-tricks/echem1.tex
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc-de/german/latex-tipps-und-tricks/echem2.tex
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/german/latex-tipps-und-tricks/echem2.tex
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/german/latex-tipps-und-tricks/echem1.tex
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/german/latex-tipps-und-tricks/echem.tex
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/german/latex-tipps-und-tricks/echem.sty


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-26-386
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages texlive-doc-de depends on:
ii  texlive-common             2005.dfsg.1-1 TeX Live: Base component
ii  texlive-doc-base           2005.dfsg.1-1 TeX Live: Base documentation

texlive-doc-de recommends no packages.

Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.4      Debian configuration management 
sy
ii  ucf                           2.0015     Update Configuration File: 
preserv

Versions of packages texlive-doc-de is related to:
pn  tetex-base                    <none>     (no description available)
pn  tetex-bin                     <none>     (no description available)
pn  tetex-extra                   <none>     (no description available)

-- debconf information:
  tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
  tex-common/cnf_name:
  tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:


-- 
CUBIC
blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/



Reply to: