Re: move to subversion
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 09:50:04AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> >> The tetex-texmf upstream tarball always unpacked the subdirectories of
> >> TEXMF{DIST,MAIN} into the current directory. In tetex-base_2.0.2, the
> >> tarball has been recreated to unpack into texmf/, but in 3.0 I have kept
> >> it as it is, because dpkg can handle this by itself.
> >
> > That shouldn't affect the repository, though, which is only interested
> > in the unpacked version.
>
> But the unpacked version in sarge only has the subdirectories
> tetex-base-2.0.2c/debian and tetex-base-2.0.2c/texmf, while etch is
> going to have tetex-base-3.0/{context,debian,doc,fonts,tex,web2c} etc.
Then a different suggestion: let's move to subversion for etch,
starting with what we have in experimental and stick with CVS for
sarge's lifetime for doing security updates or whatever. Not the
cleanest, but probably the simplest for this point in the release
cycle.
Julian
Reply to: