Re: move to subversion
Richard Lewis <rtf@jabble.com> wrote:
>> We should probably have a copy of the sarge version in it, but
>> then, for tetex-base, there's the problem of the directory move. I
>> guess there isn't a "nice" solution for this?
>
> i'm not quite sure what you refer to,
The tetex-texmf upstream tarball always unpacked the subdirectories of
TEXMF{DIST,MAIN} into the current directory. In tetex-base_2.0.2, the
tarball has been recreated to unpack into texmf/, but in 3.0 I have kept
it as it is, because dpkg can handle this by itself.
> but subversion does support
> symlinks as well as files/dir moves
This is very good. Then we should check in the sarge version first,
manually move the subdirs of texmf/ to the toplevel directory, and after
that import the new upstream version.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: