Bug#225004: tetex-extra: Type1 fonts should be in a separate package
On 25.11.04 Florent Rougon (f.rougon@free.fr) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
Hi,
> > I've opened #280567 against mozilla-browser, to add a suggest
> > (firefox does that already). I guess we can close these bugs.
> > Hmm: on the one hand I don't like to throw away the work I've done,
> > on the other hand it is surplus now.
> > To all: What do you think? Should we close that bug or are the other
> > fonts in tetex-extra (which are not covered by latex-xft-fonts) worth
> > to provide them to the rest of the world?
>
> Looking at the pfb files provided by tetex-extra (all paths are relative
> to /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1; order is the one obtained with
> 'dpkg -L tetex-extra'):
>
> bluesky/cyrillic not useful to me, but probably to someone else; don't
> seem to be available to X apps [With The Packages
> Installed In My Sid Chroot]
>
apt-cache search cyrillic | grep font
should give you more than one hit.
> public/eurosym not many characters in these (5 in every variation,
> as it seems), but probably could be useful...
>
Does it provide more than the Euro-sign? If no, that one should be
contained at least in xfonts-xxxdpi-transcoded.
> HTH a bit.
>
Thanks for investigation!
H.
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: