Bug#225687: Reg.: fixed-upstream
Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
I'm sending copies to the bugs that don't yet have a remark in the
archive _why_ they are tagged fixed-upstream. Excuses to the list for
the "mail bombing".
> On 14.05.04 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>> If you find a "confirmed in 3.0" or "confirmed for 2.96" or the
>> like on http://people.debian.org/~frank/tetex-bin_bugs_sorted.html
>> and http://people.debian.org/~frank/tetex-base_bugs_sorted.html,
>> you can safely assume that I have checked it yet.
>>
> OK, thanks. Further:
> 176153, confirmed in 2.95
See remark at #181932: Is fixed
> 195711, confirmed in 2.95
Fixed in latex bug database, and the file in the march beta has a higher
version number and date - therefore fixed.
> 195109, confirmed in 2.95
nice description by you (Hille) why it's in fact fixed.
> 206315, confirmed in 2.95
Is fixed in march Beta.
> 134763:
I uploaded it to CTAN, and it's fixed in the May beta.
> 186209, confirmed by Steafn for xdvi xdvik-22.74. in teTeX 2.95 is
> 22.81.1
> 222398, confirmed by Stefan for 22.77.x
> 175560, confirmed by Stefan for 22.74
> 107637, confirmed by Stefan for 22.76.1
tetex-3.0 has xdvik-22.8+ - I think we need not confirm all of these
separately.
> 184875, changelog of 2.96.2:
> update modes.mf. Can we assume, that it is fixed?
> latest changelog:
> * add mode dpdfezzz (8000dpi) to mktexpk for -Ppdf
Fixed in May beta.
> 225687, confirmed as you told me in a private mail.
Yes, in fact it does not even give a proper error report, it even says
"foo bar.tex" not found - it seems it can now read files with spaces.
> further in latest teTeX (needs to be confirmed before tagged
> fixed-upstream):
>
> 175794,
> * pslatex improved, needs to be confirmed.
I need to ask David regarding the licensing of the changes. Just sent
out the mail.
> 229598,
> * add definitions for a0, a1 and a2 to dvips' config.ps
This is included in the May beta.
> 202472,
> * add type1 version of doublestroke fonts
The pfb files are in the May beta texmf tarball.
> fix for our internal bug for when trying to build formats
> * manually update tex-pl.pool pdfetex-pl.pool
That's also fixed in the May beta, according to the anouncement.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: