Bug#207810: More details to Bug#207810

[Jens Seidel <tux-master@web.de>]

Hi,

I want to give a little more information to the undocumented "CJKbookmarks" 
hyperref option.

First of all I uploaded http://people.freenet.de/jese/reference.zh-cn.tex.
You can run latex on this file, to verify the incompatibility of hyperref 
and CJK without the mentioned option.
This is the Chinese translation of "Debian Reference" (homepage: 
qref.sf.net). You need at least the following Debian packages to compile:
cjk-latex, (freetype1-tools??), tfm-arphic-bsmi00lp, tfm-arphic-bkai00mp, 
tfm-arphic-gbsn00lp, tfm-arphic-gkai00mp, hbf-jfs56, hbf-cns40-b5.
(The build will fail without these Chinese .tfm files).

Without CJKbookmarks option I get the following LaTeX error:

Chapter 1.
! Use of \pdfmark@ doesn't match its definition.
\protected@write ...le@protect \edef \reserved@a {
                                                  \write #1{#3}}\reserved@a 
...
l.127 \chapter{Ðò}

I know that I filled this bug against tetex-doc, but why isn't CJKbookmarks 
used by default, whenever CJK.sty is used?
It should not hard to do perform
\AtBeginDocument{checkforCJK{CJK isn't used}{add CJKbookmarks to hyperref 
option}}
(with proper checkforCJK macro, of course) in hyperref.sty.

Jens