Re: kernel-image-2.6.3-1 (testing) mouse problem
You need to modprobe the appropriate modules (mousedev and psmouse, I
believe). This was about where I gave up on the Debian images and
decided to compile my own.
On 2004-03-09, Gordon Farquharson <gordon@mirsl.ecs.umass.edu> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have installed the testing (Sarge) kernel package
> (kernel-image-2.6.3-1). Using this kernel, XFree86 is unable to find a
> core pointer (my PS/2 mouse). I suspect this is because there isn't a
> handler associated for the mouse device in /proc/bus/input/devices (see
> below). Does anybody else have this problem ? Should I submit a bug report ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Gordon
>
> > uname -a
>
> Linux fopair 2.6.3-1-686 #2 Tue Feb 24 20:24:38 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> > cat /proc/bus/input/devices
>
> I: Bus=0011 Vendor=0001 Product=0001 Version=ab41
> N: Name="AT Translated Set 2 keyboard"
> P: Phys=isa0060/serio0/input0
> H: Handlers=kbd
> B: EV=120003
> B: KEY=4 2000000 3802078 f840d001 f2ffffdf ffefffff ffffffff fffffffe
> B: LED=7
>
> I: Bus=0011 Vendor=0002 Product=0001 Version=0001
> N: Name="PS/2 Logitech Mouse"
> P: Phys=isa0060/serio1/input0
> H: Handlers=
> B: EV=7
> B: KEY=70000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> B: REL=3
>
> > cat /proc/bus/input/handlers
>
> N: Number=0 Name=kbd
>
> > cat /proc/interrupts
>
> CPU0
> 0: 5866974 XT-PIC timer
> 1: 9792 XT-PIC i8042
> 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 5: 3920 XT-PIC eth0
> 8: 4 XT-PIC rtc
> 9: 55 XT-PIC acpi, aic7xxx
> 10: 0 XT-PIC via82cxxx, es1371
> 11: 20245 XT-PIC sym53c8xx
> 12: 719 XT-PIC i8042
> 14: 2 XT-PIC ide0
> 15: 15 XT-PIC ide1
> NMI: 0
> LOC: 5867469
> ERR: 0
> MIS: 0
>
> --
> Gordon Farquharson
> Microwave Remote Sensing Laboratory (MIRSL)
> University of Massachusetts, Amherst
> gordon@mirsl.ecs.umass.edu
>
>
>
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
My key was last signed 10/14/2003. If you use GPG *please* see me about
signing the key. ***** My computer can't give you viruses by email. ***
Reply to: