[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Testing removal summary 2024-07-08 (Monday)



The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:

  REMOVED: cubicsdr 0.2.7+dfsg-3
    <https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
    # 1065958 in soapysdr
    # 1051567

  REMOVED: ethstats 1.2.1-4
    <https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
    # 1071683 in feature-check

  REMOVED: feature-check 2.1.0-2
    <https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
    # 1071683

  REMOVED: graph-tool 2.68+ds-1
    <https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/ginggs>
    # 20240707
    # 1074519

  REMOVED: iio-sensor-proxy 3.5-1
    <https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
    # 1060562

  REMOVED: kiwi 9.25.22-1
    <https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
    # 1069389

  REMOVED: kiwi-boxed-plugin 0.2.31-1
    <https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
    # 1069389 in kiwi

  REMOVED: nik4 1.7-2
    <https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/sramacher>
    # 2024-07-07
    # finish mapnik transition; #1069130

  REMOVED: python-mapnik 1:0.0~20200224-7da019cf9-5
    <https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/sramacher>
    # 2024-07-07
    # finish mapnik transition; #1069130

  REMOVED: tox-delay 0.1.4-1
    <https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
    # 1071683 in feature-check

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


Reply to: