Testing migration summary 2024-04-11 (Thursday)
On 2024-04-11 (Thursday), the following source package(s) entered testing:
source package version previous
------------------------------------------------------------------
access-modifier-checker 1.33-1 1.32-1
cam2ip 1.6-2 (not in testing)
checkpw 1.02-4 1.02-3
emacspeak 53.0+dfsg-3 (not in testing)
emacspeak-ss 1.12.1-9 (not in testing)
flowblade 2.14.0.1-2 2.12.0.2-1
fontmath 0.9.3-1 0.9.2-1
freedombox 24.8 24.7
golang-github-crc-org-crc 2.34.0+ds1-1 (not in testing)
golang-github-korandiz-v4l 1.1.0-3 1.1.0-2
golang-github-lmittmann-tint 1.0.4-2 (not in testing)
gtkmm-documentation 4.10.1-1 3.24.0-1
instaloader 4.11+ds-1 4.10.3+ds-1
latex-mk 2.1-4 2.1-3
linux-firewire-utils 0.5.1-1 0.5.0-2
magic-wormhole 0.13.0-1 0.12.0-1.1
magic-wormhole-mailbox-server 0.4.1-3 (not in testing)
mailscripts 29-1 28-1
masakari 17.0.0-1 (not in testing)
meteo-qt 3.3-2.1 (not in testing)
mwclient 0.10.1-3 0.10.1-2
ocaml-cry 1.0.3-1 1.0.2-2
ocaml-duppy 0.9.4-1 0.9.3-2
ocaml-ffmpeg 1.1.11-1 1.1.10-1
ocaml-lastfm 0.3.4-1 (not in testing)
ocaml-metadata 0.3.0-1 0.2.0-1
opencamlib 2023.01.11-5 2023.01.11-4
pg-roaringbitmap 0.5.4-2 (not in testing)
pgfaceting 0.2.0-2 (not in testing)
procyon 0.6.0-2 0.6.0-1
pycairo 1.26.0-1 1.25.1-2
pymediainfo 6.1.0-1 6.0.1-2
pypdf 4.2.0-1 4.1.0-1
python-dbutils 3.1.0-1 3.0.3-2
python-filelock 3.13.3-1 3.13.1-1
python-mitogen 0.3.6-1 0.3.5-1
python-parsel 1.9.1+dfsg-1 1.9.0+dfsg-1
quodlibet 4.6.0-3 4.6.0-1
requests-file 2.0.0-1 1.5.1-2
skeema 1.11.2+ds-1 1.11.1+ds-1
sugar-artwork 0.121-1 (not in testing)
syncplay 1.7.2+repack1-1 1.7.1+repack1-1
tack 1.09+20230201-1 1.08-1
untex 1:1.2-8 1:1.2-7
virtnbdbackup 2.7-1 2.4-2
watcher 12.0.0-1 (not in testing)
xapian-core 1.4.25-1 1.4.22-1
xracer 0.96.9.1-12 0.96.9.1-11
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.
Reply to: