Testing removal summary 2024-01-15 (Monday)
The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:
REMOVED: ap-utils 1.5-5
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
# 1057542
REMOVED: barrier 2.4.0+dfsg-4
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
# 1057544
REMOVED: freecad 0.20.2+dfsg1-10
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
# 1055697 in pivy
REMOVED: lyskom-elisp-client 0.48+git.20200923.ec349ff4-3
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
# 1058739
REMOVED: macs 2.2.9.1-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
# 1056813
REMOVED: pivy 0.6.8-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
# 1055697
REMOVED: pplpy 0.8.9-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
# 1056832
REMOVED: python-unicodecsv 0.14.1-7
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: pytorch 2.0.1+dfsg-5
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/sramacher>
# 2024-01-13; done 2024-01-14
# finish benchmark transition; pytorch FTBFS and fails autopkgtests #1060097
REMOVED: pytorch-cuda 2.0.1+dfsg-5
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/sramacher>
# 2024-01-13; done 2024-01-14
# finish benchmark transition; pytorch FTBFS and fails autopkgtests #1060097
REMOVED: scanbd 1.5.1-7
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
# 1058749
REMOVED: sunpy 5.1.0-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
# 1055892,1058170
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.
Reply to: