[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted leafnode 1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0 (source amd64)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:25:17 +0000
Source: leafnode
Binary: leafnode
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0
Distribution: testing
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org>
Changed-By: Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org>
Description: 
 leafnode   - NNTP server for small sites
Changes: 
 leafnode (1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0) testing; urgency=low
 .
   * Rebuild for lenny since libpcre3 has had a soname bump in unstable.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 983634be73e48748785550500644eebee022627f 1035 leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0.dsc
 504aadd18dd56a0bd1357213e7037655765a64fc 51106 leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0.diff.gz
 91a93fa9acef46e5f70e0e3aa626d06b39393bda 350982 leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 d8cbd5d2a228f52d60754f8c05cc0560d9e496ad04e81c4b122864cf8e117c66 1035 leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0.dsc
 7ee15de6df39c81d8e37a96f51e387f00bc1d07e33ee0f9ae8ee90c6dfd01209 51106 leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0.diff.gz
 a0b8ea78b33e2658c93ed7bdea7a3728136c2dc65e330d69b215eac5acba18d5 350982 leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0_amd64.deb
Files: 
 e3a4b63c9cb5ee26da1548684dc54249 1035 news extra leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0.dsc
 fbc3e32f5d50b6ad4d44b38b724dbcd9 51106 news extra leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0.diff.gz
 bd5a0d4ae6376872140582c1959860a1 350982 news extra leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAklX2r0ACgkQJ2Vo11xhU607QwCgjqSlEOrAzVeVBdEVRzRqRt1O
i7IAoLaNU2/E83RLzcuH7HXC/O3r/CAv
=LCrl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/leafnode/leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0.diff.gz
leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0.dsc
  to pool/main/l/leafnode/leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0.dsc
leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/l/leafnode/leafnode_1.11.7.rc1-10~lenny0_amd64.deb


Reply to: