Testing removal summary 2006-11-19 (Sunday)
The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:
REMOVED: libsmbios 0.12.1-2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20061118; done 20061119
Bug #399205: libsmbios-dev: where is libsmbios.so ?
# new, totally broken -dev package, no grace period
REMOVED: xlockmore 1:5.22-1.1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20061118; done 20061119
Bug #318123: [CVE-2006-0061] xlockmore: xlock segfaults with libpam-opensc, returns to user session
# submitter tried to reopen in Jan 2006, bug remained under radar due to 'fixed' tag
The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: affix-kernel 2.1.2-2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20061119
Bug #399345: Obsolete: 2.4 only and already scheduled for removal
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: dmenu 1.4-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
Bug #398828: RM: dmenu -- RoM; superseded by dwm-tools
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: initrd-tools 0.1.84.1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
Bug #395181: missing dependency on libdevmapper1.01
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: lsbappchk 1.3.4-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
Bug #398874: RM: lsbappchk -- RoM; superseded by lsb-appchk2 and lsb-appchk3 and obsolete
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: lynx-cur 2.8.7dev1-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20061119
Bug #369386: Separate lynx-cur package should probably not be included in Etch
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: pdfkit.framework 0.8-6
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
Bug #398857: ftp.debian.org: RM: pdfkit.framework -- RoM; unused, superseded
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: xen-unstable 3.0-unstable+hg11561-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
Bug #395332: xen-unstable - not suitable for a release
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
--
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Reply to: