[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Testing removal summary 2006-10-04 (Wednesday)



The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:

  REMOVED: camstream 0.26.3-9
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
    # 20061002; done 20061004
    Bug #387249: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
    # reuploaded/orphaned right when the fix would have gone in, remove for now

  REMOVED: libopensync-plugin-syncml 0.4.0+svn20060725-3
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
    # 20061002; done 20061004
    Bug #384306: libsyncml0: libsyncml needs to be rebuilt, depends on no longer existing symbol

  REMOVED: libsyncml 0.4.0+svn20060721-3
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
    # 20061002; done 20061004
    Bug #384306: libsyncml0: libsyncml needs to be rebuilt, depends on no longer existing symbol

  REMOVED: plptools 0.14-4
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
    # 20061002; done 20061004
    Bug #388642: libplpc2a: file conflict with plptools

  REMOVED: wbxml2 0.9.2-1
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
    # 20061002; done 20061004
    Bug #384306: libsyncml0: libsyncml needs to be rebuilt, depends on no longer existing symbol

The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: gcj-4.0 4.0.3-2
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: mozilla 2:1.7.12-1.2
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
    # 20060916
    # mozilla is going away; only needs swt-gtk, eclipse updated

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: swt-gtk 3.1-3
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
    Bug #354358: FTBFS on 64-bit architectures: loses precision
    Bug #359075: FTBFS on 64-bit architectures: loses precision
    Bug #361430: FTBFS on 64-bit architectures: loses precision

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.



Reply to: