Testing removal summary 2006-10-03 (Tuesday)
The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:
REMOVED: selinux-policy-default 1:1.26-7
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20061002; done 20061003
Bug #390648: FTBFS: will not create hard link
# RoM
REMOVED: xserver-kdrive 6.6.1-1
Package not in unstable
The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: camstream 0.26.3-9
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20061002
Bug #387249: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
# reuploaded/orphaned right when the fix would have gone in, remove for now
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: gcj-4.0 4.0.3-2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: libopensync-plugin-syncml 0.4.0+svn20060725-3
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20061002
Bug #384306: libsyncml0: libsyncml needs to be rebuilt, depends on no longer existing symbol
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: libsyncml 0.4.0+svn20060721-3
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20061002
Bug #384306: libsyncml0: libsyncml needs to be rebuilt, depends on no longer existing symbol
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: mozilla 2:1.7.12-1.2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20060916
# mozilla is going away; only needs swt-gtk, eclipse updated
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: plptools 0.14-4
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20061002
Bug #388642: libplpc2a: file conflict with plptools
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: swt-gtk 3.1-3
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
Bug #354358: FTBFS on 64-bit architectures: loses precision
Bug #359075: FTBFS on 64-bit architectures: loses precision
Bug #361430: FTBFS on 64-bit architectures: loses precision
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: wbxml2 0.9.2-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20061002
Bug #384306: libsyncml0: libsyncml needs to be rebuilt, depends on no longer existing symbol
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
--
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Reply to: