Testing removal summary 2006-07-25 (Tuesday)
The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:
REMOVED: libtexttools 2.0.3-3.1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/adeodato>
# 2006-07-22; done 2006-07-23
# broken ABI without soname bump (#378824)
The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: apt-proxy 1.9.33-0.1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20060724
Bug #375677: apt-proxy breaks after last python-twisted update
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: dnsmasq 2.32-2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20060724
Bug #364800: no answer to dnsmasq broadcasts
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: eagle-usb 2.1.1-2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20060724
Bug #377326: eagle-usb-modules-source: fails to compile
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: libbsf-java 1:2.3.0+cvs20050308-6
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
#20060715
Bug #376107: libbsf-java: FTBFS: .orig.tar.gz missing and Build-Dependencies can not be satisfied
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: libmx4j-java 2.1.1-4
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
#20060714
Bug #377167: libmx4j-java: Removed Build-Depends
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: skkdic 20040323-1.1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/djpig>
# lets get this moving, #272127
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
--
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Reply to: