[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Testing removal summary 2006-07-18 (Tuesday)



The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:

  REMOVED: bcm4400-source 3.0.7-5
    Package not in unstable

  REMOVED: kernel-latest-2.4-s390 2.4.27-1sarge1
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
    # 20060716; done 20060717
    # obsolete kernels, and uninstallable besides

  REMOVED: libcharles0 0.0.20050217-3
    Package not in unstable

  REMOVED: libdbix-class-loader-perl 0.21-1
    Package not in unstable

  REMOVED: messagewall 1.0.8+dfsg-0.1
    Package not in unstable

  REMOVED: mmix 1:0.0.20030622-2
    Package not in unstable

  REMOVED: prospect 5:0.9.8b-8
    Package not in unstable

  REMOVED: rpm2html 1.8.1-1
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
    # 20060715; done 20060716
    Bug #339872: rpm2html: FTBFS: rpmopen.c:857: undefined reference to `rpmBuildFileList'

  REMOVED: twin 0.4.0-7
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/djpig>
    # orphaned shit
    # I really don't bother doing the g++ transition for these

  REMOVED: www-sql 0.5.7-19
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
    #20060715
    Bug #358822: www-sql: Upgrade build-depends from libmysqlclient10-dev to 15

  REMOVED: zope-cmfactionicons 1:0.9-4
    Package not in unstable

The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: libbsf-java 1:2.3.0+cvs20050308-6
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
    #20060715
    Bug #376107: libbsf-java: FTBFS: .orig.tar.gz missing and Build-Dependencies can not be satisfied

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: libmx4j-java 2.1.1-4
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
    #20060714
    Bug #377167: libmx4j-java: Removed Build-Depends

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: skkdic 20040323-1.1
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/djpig>
    # lets get this moving, #272127

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.



Reply to: