Testing removal summary 2006-03-27 (Monday)
The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:
REMOVED: dbtcp 0.1.17-4.3
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: goldedplus 1.1.4.7+1.1.5.20051016-3
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: openobex-apps 1.0.0-rel-6
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: projectcenter 0.4.2-0.2
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: terminal 0.9.4+cvs20041218-0.2
Package not in unstable
The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: gorm 0.9.2-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20060210
# removed for the gnustep transition, maintainer says they should go away
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: ndiswrapper-modules-i386 1.1-2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/djpig>
Bug #323742: FTBFS: Unable to find gcc-3.3
# ndiswrapper-utils is rdepends...
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: skkdic 20040323-1.1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/djpig>
# lets get this moving, #272127
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: viewpdf.app 0.9-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20060210
Bug #350037: gnustep: broken dependencies
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: xqf 1.0.4-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20060326
Bug #355045: xqf: Fails to run - segmentation fault
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: zeroconf 0.6.1-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20060326
Bug #348703: strange interaction with my ADSL2+ modem
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
--
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Reply to: