Hi, Le 10.02.2012 10:16, Gaudenz Steinlin a écrit : > On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:46:04 +0100, Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> wrote: >> That being said, it is obvious that reducing the overall prices is a >> good thing, but I think we are a bit too late at this point. >> >>> - We should probably at least ask Le Camp if they in general see the >>> possibility to give us some discount (especially on the food). We >>> could also discuss options where we don't rent some of the houses for >>> debcamp. Luca are you going to do this or would you prefer if someone >>> else talked to them? >> >> I would prefer if someone else would take care of that, first because I >> do not share this idea *at this point* of the bid and second because I >> am going to travel over the week-end and the next week again I will not >> have good connectivity. > > I would do that, but my French is a bit poor so that I fear I won't be > able to communicate this in the right tone. Didier are you up for this? I tend to agree with Luca here: I don't think it's appropriate to discuss discounts with Mr. Pianaro now; while he has been delaying his year scheduling for us and can't even be certain that we will come. >> I had the chance to talk to some guys organizing the RMLL in Genève this >> July and they told me that they have planned to have meals at around 8.- >> CHF each in Geneva: this is done hiring people that they know, which is >> something we could consider. This obviously means extra work for us, >> which should be taken into account. > > OK, that's the same thing Michael Germini talked about, right? I guess > this would add up to about 24.- CHF for the whole day. I added this > price to the wiki. In my experience, cooking for 300 persons implies a cooking team of 10-15 skilled persons, plus having a big car (or two) available. (It would be almost a full-time job for those volunteers). I doubt we could do without hiring at least 2-3 professionals. 3 persons at ~150CHF a day (which is _cheap_ for that work) is 14*3*150 = 6300 CHF. >>> Beside these two points we should also work on answer to all the points >>> on the Priority List[1]. In addition to the priority list we have to >>> prepare: >>> >>> * A description of the weak points in their own bids. That's IMHO: <http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/Switzerland/Bid#Possible_problems_and_how_we_intend_to_solve_them> (To be filled) >>> * A description of the strong points in other bids. And I apppended a "Strong points in other bids to our bid page: <http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/Switzerland/Bid#Latvia> Cheers, OdyX
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf13-ch mailing list Debconf13-ch@lists.debconf.net http://lists.debconf.net/mailman/listinfo/debconf13-ch