[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#561891: Bug 561891: Is FTBFS for fio on SuperH (sh4) resolved?



Hi,

2011/8/25 Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>:
> Hi!
>
> I am putting upstream author Jens Axboe on CC.

Thanks!

>
> Am Donnerstag, 25. August 2011 schrieb Nobuhiro Iwamatsu:
>> Hi,
> [...]
>>
>> 2011/8/3 Martin Steigerwald <ms@teamix.de>:
>> > Hello Nobuhiro, Paul, hello Debian SuperH maintainers, hello Jens,
>> >
>> > I am seeking information on the current status regarding
>> >
>> > Please support sh4
>> > http://bugs.debian.org/561891
>> >
>> > and eventually help in resolving it if it has not already been
>> > resolved.
>> >
>> > When I am reading
>> >
>> > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=fio&suite=unstabl
>> > e
>> >
>> > correctly, then fio 1.50-1 has been build 167d before on buildd
>> > kongou.
>> >
>> > So is this issue resolved?
>> >
>> > If not, please offer help. There is a partial patch mentioned earlier
>> > in the bug report.
>>
>> By this method, we cannot support both SH4 and SH4A. When we build
>> with machine of SH4A, a binary to work only in SH4A is built.
>> Because Debian SH team are supporting sh4 and sh4a in one binary, this
>> becomes the problem.
>> And this is a problem peculiar to Debian. It will not become the
>> problem in other distribution. (e.g., Gentoo)
>> It is necessary to check whether you do not do it whether we support
>> synco when we support both CPU's when we execute  *_barrier.
>> I think that this has a big overhead.
>>
>> I attached quick hack patch.
>
> Jens, what do you think about such a patch? Please advice.
>
> Nobuhiro, where do you think comes the big overhead from? In your patch
> you check once at beginning for sinco capability. Do you refer to the if
> statement you added in arch/arch-sh.h?
>

I thought that an overhead was bigger than the patch which you wrote as for
my performing a check of synco every time when a program called memory barrier.
Actually, the patch which you wrote is enough.

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro
-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
   iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
   GPG ID: 40AD1FA6


Reply to: