Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures
On 02.03.2011 17:54, Martin Guy wrote:
> On 2 March 2011 02:34, Matthias Klose <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> armel (although optimized for a different processor)
> For which processor (/architecture) is it optimized, and do you mean
> optimized-for, or only-runs-on?
> I ask in case this would mean dumping all the armv4t systems that are
> using Debian armel.
I didn't propose changing the minimum required processor for armel. I said that
4.5 looks ok, although I can only say that for another processor default (armv7-a).