Re: SSH Vulnerbility(?)

To: Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org>
Cc: debian-ssh@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: SSH Vulnerbility(?)
From: ucko@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko)
Date: 26 Jun 2002 08:52:28 -0400
Message-id: <udly9d2mcc3.fsf@multics.mit.edu>
In-reply-to: <5bfzza1ico.fsf@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <20020625222340.GA2497@fonz.net> <20020625222340.GA2497@fonz.net> <udlwusm6dhp.fsf@multics.mit.edu> <5bfzza1ico.fsf@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> writes:

> FSVO "work", of course. 2.0.x kernels seem to be a complete no-go,
> from reports I've been getting...

Granted, though I doubt there are too many users of unstable still at 2.0.x.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger amu@monk.mit.edu (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ssh-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SSH Vulnerbility(?)
  - From: Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org>

References:
- SSH Vulnerbility(?)
  - From: Ilan Rabinovitch <ilan@fonz.net>
- Re: SSH Vulnerbility(?)
  - From: ucko@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko)
- Re: SSH Vulnerbility(?)
  - From: Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org>

Prev by Date: SSH exploit and commerical SSH
Next by Date: Re: SSH Vulnerbility(?)
Previous by thread: Re: SSH Vulnerbility(?)
Next by thread: Re: SSH Vulnerbility(?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread