Re: SSH Vulnerbility(?)
firstname.lastname@example.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes:
> Already done for woody (and potato, just in case 1.2.3 was also
> vulnerable); please see <http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-134>.
> Nothing seems to have been uploaded to unstable yet, but the woody
> updates should work there.
FSVO "work", of course. 2.0.x kernels seem to be a complete no-go,
from reports I've been getting...
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org