On Sunday 15 April 2007 23:22, Robert Reif wrote: > Jurij Smakov wrote: > >* Nearly complete lack of upstream support. David Miller, current > > upstream maintainer of sparc64 has expressed his thoughts on the > > topic in [0], triggering the discussion about dropping sparc32 > > support in Aurora Linux. [1] > >* Several serious problems, like lack of SMP support and driver > > failures (CD-ROMs do not work for some reason). > >* Shrinking userbase, flaky hardware. > > Why can't you have official sparc32 and sparc64 ports? > That way you can optimize sparc64 and still have sparc32 support. Any reason why you completely ignoring the first three (and probably most important) reasons for dropping sparc32?
Attachment:
pgpe6_QVaLOqG.pgp
Description: PGP signature