Re: procps doesn't buildd - /lib versus /lib64

To: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
Cc: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org, csmall@enc.com.au, ja2morri@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
Subject: Re: procps doesn't buildd - /lib versus /lib64
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:04:47 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040301200447.GD28945@scowler.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040301130422.GM1078@phunnypharm.org>
References: <1078113561.2233.173.camel@cube> <20040301041400.GI1078@phunnypharm.org> <1078116078.2233.188.camel@cube> <20040301050413.GK1078@phunnypharm.org> <[🔎] 1078122981.2233.216.camel@cube> <[🔎] 20040301130422.GM1078@phunnypharm.org>

> No, Solaris has normal libs in /lib and their 64-bit libs in /lib64.
> Just like we do. Neat, huh?

In which version is that true?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: procps doesn't buildd - /lib versus /lib64
  - From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>

References:
- Re: procps doesn't buildd - /lib versus /lib64
  - From: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>
- Re: procps doesn't buildd - /lib versus /lib64
  - From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>