Re: Performance on Sparc Ultra 10
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 11:27, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after compiling a 2.4.21 without module support and left out any unused stuff
> I was able to increase disk performance of my Ultra 10 (256 MB Ram, 333 MHz):
>
> bonnie:
> Install-Kernel (woody):
> ehec2,496M,2655,82,11695,63,2407,56,1621,91,3374,80,93.2,20,16,300,96,+++++,+++,14258,100,303,97,+++++,+++,1612,88
>
> 2.4.21:
> ehec2,496M,3316,98,13866,27,5968,13,2856,92,12546,13,123.9,1,16,261,97,
+++++,+++,13110,100,270,97,+++++,+++,1658,96
Some comparative bonnie++ results ...
2.4.21 from Debian, Ultra 10 333 CPU, 512M RAM, mdma2 IDE 7200 RPM,
2M buffer
1G,3363,98,20275,38,5936,14,3148,95,14885,16,174.8,1,16,279,98,
+++++,+++,13568,100,289,99,+++++,+++,1666,96
no attempts at optimization with hdparm; unmaskirq=0 is another
difference from x86 platform
2.4.19, PC clone Athlon XP 1800+ CPU, 256M RAM, udma5 IDE
7200 RPM, 2M buffer
496M,13993,98,42720,22,15410,5,13887,95,38838,8,215.2,0,16,1714,96,
+++++,+++,+++++,+++,1795,99,+++++,+++,4073,98
2.4.20, powermac 7300 w/G3-450 CPU, 448M RAM, fastnarrowscsi 7200 RPM
1G,6533,87,10500,14,3553,11,4032,55,7448,14,91.4,3,16,237,99,
+++++,+++,26169,97,239,99,+++++,+++,813,100
-- SP
Reply to: