[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: reiserfs on software raid on sparc/2.4.18 ?



Hello,

If your arch is Sparc32, it's advised of use a 2.2.x kernel ... Try that
solution ....

bath66
----- Original Message -----
From: "nate" <debian-sparc@aphroland.org>
To: <debian-sparc@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:35 AM
Subject: reiserfs on software raid on sparc/2.4.18 ?


> not pretty!
>
> is it possible ?
>
> sparky:/usr/share/doc/raidtools2/examples# mkreiserfs /dev/md0
>
> <-------------mkreiserfs, 2002------------->
> reiserfsprogs 3.x.1b
>
> mkreiserfs: Guessing about desired format..
> mkreiserfs: Kernel 2.4.18 is running.
> Format 3.6 with standard journal
> Count of blocks on the device: 261856
> Number of blocks consumed by mkreiserfs formatting process: 8219
> Blocksize: 4096
> Hash function used to sort names: "r5"
> Journal Size 8193 blocks (first block 18)
> Journal Max transaction length 1024
> inode generation number: 0
> UUID: 31588a0a-6b68-4db8-a873-a2e977ec97a1
> ATTENTION: YOU SHOULD REBOOT AFTER FDISK!
>         ALL DATA WILL BE LOST ON '/dev/md0'!
> Continue (y/n):y
> Initializing journal - 0%....20%....40%....60%....80%....100%
> data_access_exception: SFSR[0000000000801009] SFAR[fffff802316856fc],
going.
>               \|/ ____ \|/
>               "@'/ .. \`@"
>               /_| \__/ |_\
>                  \__U_/
> mkreiserfs(215): Dax
> TSTATE: 0000000011009604 TPC: 0000000000588a84 TNPC: 0000000000588a88 Y:
> 00000001    Not tainted
> g0: fffff800099dc6e8 g1: fffee0022217c700 g2: 0000000000000001 g3:
> fffee0022217c6dc
> g4: fffff80000000000 g5: fffee0022217c720 g6: fffff8000ecf0000 g7:
> 0000000000000054
> o0: 00000000001ff6f0 o1: 0000000000000000 o2: fffff8000f2b53c0 o3:
> 000000000044e000
> o4: 0000000000000002 o5: 0000000000000000 sp: fffff8000ecf2ea1 ret_pc:
> fffff8000f50901c
> l0: fffff8000f509000 l1: fffff8000f509448 l2: 0000000000659000 l3:
> 0000000000000002
> l4: 0000000000000000 l5: 0000000000000004 l6: 0000000000000000 l7:
> 0000000000000008
> i0: fffed802316856fc i1: 0000000000000000 i2: 0000000000000000 i3:
> 0000000000000001
> i4: 0000000000000000 i5: fffff8000f509000 i6: fffff8000ecf2f61 i7:
> 0000000000588ce0
> Caller[0000000000588ce0]
> Caller[000000000058afc0]
> Caller[0000000000534d70]
> Caller[0000000000534e60]
> Caller[000000000045f2c4]
> Caller[0000000000462b6c]
> Caller[000000000044dc90]
> Caller[000000000044e0cc]
> Caller[000000000045bdf0]
> Caller[0000000000410674]
> Caller[00000000000135b8]
> Instruction DUMP: 80a6c01c  02400038  8600ffdc <c4060000> 80a0a000
> 124ffff3  80a6e000  c400c00f  80a0a000
> TSTATE: 0000000011009604 TPC: 0000000000588a84 TNPC: 0000000000588a88 Y:
> 00000001    Not tainted
> g0: fffff800099dc6e8 g1: fffee0022217c700 g2: 0000000000000001 g3:
> fffee0022217c6dc
> g4: fffff80000000000 g5: fffee0022217c720 g6: fffff8000ecf0000 g7:
> 0000000000000054
> o0: 00000000001ff6f0 o1: 0000000000000000 o2: fffff8000f2b53c0 o3:
> 000000000044e000
> o4: 0000000000000002 o5: 0000000000000000 sp: fffff8000ecf2ea1 ret_pc:
> fffff8000f50901c
> l0: fffff8000f509000 l1: fffff8000f509448 l2: 0000000000659000 l3:
> 0000000000000002
> l4: 0000000000000000 l5: 0000000000000004 l6: 0000000000000000 l7:
> 0000000000000008
> i0: fffed802316856fc i1: 0000000000000000 i2: 0000000000000000 i3:
> 0000000000000001
> i4: 0000000000000000 i5: fffff8000f509000 i6: fffff8000ecf2f61 i7:
> 0000000000588ce0
> Caller[0000000000588ce0]
> Caller[000000000058afc0]
> Caller[0000000000534d70]
> Caller[0000000000534e60]
> Caller[000000000045f2c4]
> Caller[0000000000462b6c]
> Caller[000000000044dc90]
> Caller[000000000044e0cc]
> Caller[000000000045bdf0]
> Caller[0000000000410674]
> Caller[00000000000135b8]
> Instruction DUMP: 80a6c01c  02400038  8600ffdc <c4060000> 80a0a000
> 124ffff3  80a6e000  c400c00f  80a0a000
>
> Killed
>
>
> (running a custom kernel built from debian's 2.4.18 tree)
>
> nate
>
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>



Reply to: