[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: glibc2.1 and potato



	Hi,
	thanks for the advice. But I think that news packages are beign compiled
with glibc2.1. Am I wrong? I want enlightenment in my Sun! :)
	Have a nice day	,		Paulo Henrique
Quoting Sanjeev Gupta (ghane@arjun.eurolink.stpn.soft.net):
> 
> You lucky chap, you have just been saved from a lot of trouble ;-)
> 
> Do not try to install glibc2.1 on a sun4m.  Search the archives for recent
> posts by Ben Collins and me on the libc6 problem.
> 
> Till you get a go-ahead on this list, hold libc6 at 2.0.x level
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> On Tue, 11 May 1999, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
> 
> >     Hi Debian users,
> >     I tried to upgrade my Sun Sparc 5 to potato and this error occurs:
> >     What I can do?
> >     Have a nice day,        Paulo Henrique
> > 
> > Preparing to replace libc6 2.0.105-2 (using .../libc6_2.1.1-5_sparc.deb)
> > ...
> > WARNING: Your sun4m cpu is known to have problems with
> > the current glibc 2.1.1. To avoid problems, this libc6
> > install will fail. When the conflicts are resolved, a
> > version will be installed that does not fail this check.
> > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.1.1-5_sparc.deb
> > (--unpack):
> >  subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
> > Errors were encountered while processing:
> >  /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.1.1-5_sparc.deb
> > E: Sub-process returned an error code (1)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --  
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > 
> > 
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Sanjeev "Ghane" Gupta			Tel: +91(11) 6941831, 6946619
> Eurolink Systems Ltd			Fax: +91(11) 6943732
> New Delhi, India		      email: ghane@eurolink.stpn.soft.net
>           Eurolink doesn't pay me to speak for it, so I don't
>            Old age is not an accomplishment, nor youth a sin
> 


Reply to: