[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: XWindow in Sparc4



...     Hi Anders and other Sparc Debian users,
        the problem of csh is critical to me because everyone in my uni use
csh in Solaris and are wanting to change to Linux but there is this problem:
$ csh
csh: Symbol `_IO_2_1_stdin_' has different size in shared object, consider      
re-linking                                                                      
% exit                                                                          
$
        If anyone can fix this will be good.
        Reggards,               Paulo Henrique
Quoting Anders Hammarquist (iko@cd.chalmers.se):
> >     Thank you!                                                              
> >     It did the trick.                                                       
> >     Now what about csh error?                                               
> >                                                                             
> >     baptista@honolulu: ~$ csh                                               
> >     csh: Symbol `_IO_2_1_stdin_' has different size in shared object,       
+consider                                                                       
> >     re-linking                                                              
> >     baptista@honolulu: ~$                                                   
>                                                                               
> That means that your csh is linked an older libc (assuming you have the
> latest
+version of everything). The package needs to be recompiled for this message
to 
+go away. Generally, it doesn't seem to cause any problems though.              
>                                                                               
> Another solution is to replace csh with tcsh (since tcsh is compiled with a   
+recent enough libc and thus doens't complain).                                 
>                                                                               
> Regards,                                                                      
> /Anders                                                                       


Reply to: