[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#668351: marked as done (systemd-44-1 not indexed properly)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:00:05 +0100
with message-id <20191113110005.GA14712@jcristau-z4>
and subject line Re: Bug#668351: snapshot.debian.org: JSON interface returns outdated information
has caused the Debian Bug report #668351,
regarding systemd-44-1 not indexed properly
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
668351: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668351
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Severity: normal

Today 

http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120411T040119Z/pool/main/s/systemd/

lists systemd_44-1_amd64.deb but this is not discoverable using the
machine readable JSON interface:

$ date -u
Wed Apr 11 09:13:30 UTC 2012
lindi1:~$ wget --no-proxy -O - -q http://snapshot.debian.org/mr/binary/systemd/ | fold
{"binary": "systemd", "_comment": "foo", "result": [{"binary_version": "43-1", "
source": "systemd", "version": "43-1", "name": "systemd"}, {"binary_version": "3
7-1.1", "source": "systemd", "version": "37-1.1", "name": "systemd"}, {"binary_v
ersion": "37-1+b1", "source": "systemd", "version": "37-1", "name": "systemd"}, 
{"binary_version": "37-1", "source": "systemd", "version": "37-1", "name": "syst
emd"}, {"binary_version": "36-1", "source": "systemd", "version": "36-1", "name"
: "systemd"}, {"binary_version": "29-1.1", "source": "systemd", "version": "29-1
.1", "name": "systemd"}, {"binary_version": "29-1", "source": "systemd", "versio
n": "29-1", "name": "systemd"}, {"binary_version": "25-2", "source": "systemd", 
"version": "25-2", "name": "systemd"}, {"binary_version": "25-1", "source": "sys
temd", "version": "25-1", "name": "systemd"}, {"binary_version": "20-1", "source
": "systemd", "version": "20-1", "name": "systemd"}, {"binary_version": "19-1", 
"source": "systemd", "version": "19-1", "name": "systemd"}, {"binary_version": "
17-1", "source": "systemd", "version": "17-1", "name": "systemd"}, {"binary_vers
ion": "16-1", "source": "systemd", "version": "16-1", "name": "systemd"}, {"bina
ry_version": "11-1", "source": "systemd", "version": "11-1", "name": "systemd"},
 {"binary_version": "8-2", "source": "systemd", "version": "8-2", "name": "syste
md"}, {"binary_version": "8-1", "source": "systemd", "version": "8-1", "name": "
systemd"}, {"binary_version": "0~git+20100605+dfd8ee-1", "source": "systemd", "v
ersion": "0~git+20100605+dfd8ee-1", "name": "systemd"}]}

Systemd 44-1 was uploaded on 2012-04-03. Can you please investigate
what could cause this 8 day delay in the JSON interface?



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 08:18:20PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> retitle 668351 systemd-44-1 not indexed properly
> thanks
> 
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> 
> > Today 
> > 
> > http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20120411T040119Z/pool/main/s/systemd/
> > 
> > lists systemd_44-1_amd64.deb but this is not discoverable using the
> > machine readable JSON interface:
> 
> This doesn't appear to be related to the json output.  If you look at
> http://snapshot.debian.org/package/systemd/ you will see it's not listed
> there also.
> 
> Indexing happens on top of the base snapshot stuff, and it's not as
> robust as I'd like it to be.
> 
> I don't know why it didn't get indexed properly in this particular case.
> Hopefully I'll find the time to investigate some time soon.
> 
systemd 44-1 appears on that page now.  Closing.

Cheers,
Julien

--- End Message ---
Reply to: