Re: help request
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > only MIT license within DB components but the rest seems to be without
> > any clear copyright/license terms.
> Better now?
much -- thanks! although since there is no global file defining
'default' copyright/license (e.g. ./COPYING.txt or debian/copyright ;) ) , what
about those? ;)
$> licensecheck -r . | grep -v -e build -e web-cache | grep -v MIT
./web/app/setup.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
./web/app/ez_setup.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
./web/app/snapshot/tests/__init__.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
./web/app/snapshot/tests/functional/test_root.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
./web/app/snapshot/tests/functional/test_archive.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
./web/app/snapshot/tests/functional/test_package.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
./web/app/snapshot/websetup.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
./web/app/snapshot/controllers/template.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
./web/app/snapshot/lib/base.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
./web/app/snapshot/lib/helpers.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
./fsck/check-1/setup.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
./fsck/check-1/hasher.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
./OLD/db-config.rb: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
P.S. Who said that I am annoying? ;)
--
.-.
=------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------=
Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192
Linux User ^^-^^ [175555]
Reply to: