Re: /usr/lib/sgml
Neil Roeth (neil@debian.org) wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sep 16, Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo@debian.org) wrote:
> > Have you perhaps been reading my web page about sgml-base usage (or the lack of
> > it): http://people.debian.org/~ardo/PACKAGES/SGML/sgml-base.html ???
>
> Ardo,
Neil,
> There are several problems with my packages, according to this table. Since
> the entries are very brief, I am not sure what changes need to be made. Are
> you planning to put an explanation for each column somewhere? Or, perhaps you
> could file bug reports telling me briefly what needs to be done to jade, sp,
> openjade and opensp. If you do that, I will make the changes soon and get new
> packages out.
The plan is to file bug reports for the severe issues. However, filing a bug
report for e.g. an empty directory in a package might be a bit of an overkill.
But I'll also put an explanation of each of the columns on the web page.
> I guess the meaning of the comment for opensp in the column "Files in
> /usr/lib/sgml", i.e., "No (/usr/lib/opensp)", is that the files in
> /usr/lib/opensp should be in /usr/share/sgml, correct?
Yep, that's the intention.
> Thanks. I appreciate the effort you've put into this.
You're welcome. As the maintainer of sgml-base I see it more or less as my
responsibility to make sure it's used properly and according to the policy.
Why else have it?
I've now also added links to the issues from the main table.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: ardo@debian.org
home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo
GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9
Reply to: