Re: proposed change to SGML policy: symlinks

To: debian-sgml@lists.debian.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: proposed change to SGML policy: symlinks
From: Adam DiCarlo <aph@debian.org>
Date: 08 Feb 2003 11:00:28 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 86znp6907n.fsf@gopher.onshored.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 86u1ffvne1.fsf@kronstadt.homeunix.net>
References: <[🔎] 86n0l9av8f.fsf@gopher.onshored.com> <[🔎] 15938.64340.332552.933224@columbo.globaltranscorp.org> <[🔎] 86u1ffvne1.fsf@kronstadt.homeunix.net>

We seem to have consensus so far.  Ardo, what do you think?

-- 
...Adam Di Carlo..<adam@onshore-devel.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: proposed change to SGML policy: symlinks
  - From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org>

References:
- proposed change to SGML policy: symlinks
  - From: Adam DiCarlo <aph@debian.org>
- Re: proposed change to SGML policy: symlinks
  - From: Mark Johnson <mrj@debian.org>
- Re: proposed change to SGML policy: symlinks
  - From: Ian Zimmerman <itz@speakeasy.org>

Prev by Date: Re: proposed change to SGML policy: symlinks
Next by Date: Re: Docbook ldp ??
Previous by thread: Re: proposed change to SGML policy: symlinks
Next by thread: Re: proposed change to SGML policy: symlinks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread