Re: SGML/XML Policy Group - XML Catalog Update
Mark Johnson <mrj@debian.org> writes:
> I'm surprised that you find this surprising:)
Actually it makes sense. I used to know this but when I gave up
maintaining jade/openjade I forgot it all.
The only thing that would break would be relative system references in
documents which assume prefix of /usr/share/sgml, but I would guess
that is rather rare.
Anyhow -- are we going to ignore /usr/share/xml or embrace it? Last I
heard we're waiting for FHS to opine on the matter, and until then,
stick with /usr/share/sgml. I personally don't much see the point of
a separate /usr/share/xml but I'm known as something of a fuddy-duddy.
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<adam@onshore-devel.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
Reply to: