On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 01:25:37PM -0600, Mark Johnson wrote: > > Shouldn't the license be the FDL? Seems to me that the FDL is the > documentation counterpart to the GPL. > > License: FDL > For this and other issues (i.e docbook vs debiandoc) you might want to read the current draft for the DDP policy available at www.debian.org/doc/manuals/ddp-policy Regards Javi
Attachment:
pgpO9H63CDdYh.pgp
Description: PGP signature