Re: shipping the xml catalog DTD
Mark Johnson (mrj@debian.org) wrote:
> On Thursday, January 16, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When Adam and I talked about this we both came to the conclusion that
> > until the various policies (FHS, LSB) support using /usr/share/xml we
> > should be using /usr/share/sgml.
>
> Makes sense, for now anyway.
>
> Maybe we should start a push for FHS to add /usr/share/xml. It's gonna
> be needed eventually, and I'd rather do all of this once:)
True, but I would prefer to have the XML catalog stuff in place now and
don't wait for policy to catch-up. Moving it to /usr/share/xml later
should not be a big issue if the catalogs are ok.
> Does anyone on this list know if the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
> Group has even considered/discussed this addition to the FHS?
Someone started the discussion, but it died after two of three messages
with no real discussion whatsoever.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: ardo@debian.org
home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo
GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9
Reply to: