Re: shipping the xml catalog DTD
Hi All,
For what it's worth, I think it's a good idea to include the XML
Catalog spec DTD in the xml-common/xml-core package. It's part of the
basic xml infrastructure and so should be part of the infrastructure
package.
IMO, it should get put into its own subdir, for safety's
sake. Something like
/usr/share/xml/base/
or,
/usr/share/xml/oasis/
or, better yet,
/usr/share/xml/dtd/oasis/
And this structure would somewhat mirror what goes on in
/usr/share/sgml/dtd/..., thereby lending some consistency to the
system.
...my $0.02
Mark
On Tuesday, January 14, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> Adam DiCarlo (adam@onshored.com) wrote:
> > Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org> writes:
> >
> > > Huh? I thought we settled on 'xml-common'.
> >
> > Oh, hmm. I remember xml-core, but my memory is not the best. I can
> > go either way, but do be aware xml-common is the RPM name for the
> > XML'ish version of sgml-data.
>
> Well, in that case, 'xml-core' it is. We definitely don't want to
> confuse people. And bascially I don't really care either, so...
>
> Thanks,
> Ardo
> --
> Ardo van Rangelrooij
> home email: ardo@debian.org
> home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo
> GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sgml-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
_____________________________________
Mark Johnson <mark@duke.edu>
Debian XML/SGML <mrj@debian.org>
Home Page: <http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/>
GPG fp: 50DF A22D 5119 3485 E9E4 89B2 BCBC B2C8 2BE2 FE81
Reply to: