Re: [DocBook] Does the librairies have to be there...
Arnaud Vandyck <arnaud.vandyck@ulg.ac.be> writes:
> > One might go even further and break out the Java into separate
> > packages depending on the processor in question, e.g., a certain
> > version of saxon, a certain version of xalan2....
>
> Do the packages aren't separated yet? saxon643.jar, saxon644.jar,
> saxon651.jar, saxon65.jar, xalan2.jar? I don't understand, sorry.
>
> The bug is against the «docbook-xml» packages?
Well, just a minor possible wishlist. I would suggest not worrying
about it and just focussing on getting packages up to policy
compliance.
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<adam@onshore-devel.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
Reply to: