Re: question about docbook*simple
/ Michael Smith <smith@xml-doc.org> was heard to say:
| But as far as I know, no backwards-incompatible changes were introduced
| between 4.1.2.4 and 1.0CR2 (and none will be unless/until there is a 2.0
| Simplified release). So any "legacy" 4.1.2.4/docbook-xml-simple docs
| should still validate against 1.0CR2+.
|
| But you might want to check with Norm Walsh to confirm that.
I believe that is the case.
| The latest Slides release depends on Simplified 1.0CR2, so it seems like
| your initial suggestions to go with the name docbook-simple and have the
| package conflict with and replace docbook-xml-simple are the way to go.
I anticipate rolling out new versions of these (simple, slides, website) all
based off DocBook 4.2 (directly or indirectly), "real soon now". So depending
on how much effort it is to build the releases, ...
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There is no excellent beauty that hath
http://nwalsh.com/ | not some strangeness in the
| proportion.--Sir Francis Bacon
Reply to: