Re: DTD packages and versioning
James LewisMoss writes:
> >>>>> On 18 Mar 2001 17:21:28 -0500, Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com> said:
>
> Adam> I'm wondering if we should version the major releases of stuff
> Adam> like docbook-xml and docbook. For instance, should we have one
> Adam> docbook package with 2.4.1, 3.0, 3.1 and 4.1, as we do now, or
> Adam> should we perhaps break that up into docbook-2, docbook-3.0,
> Adam> docbook-3.1, docbook-4.1 ?
>
> Adam> Thoughts?
>
> It's not a lot of stuff. I'd just keep it all in one package.
OTOH, new releases might be packaged more quickly if they get
their own packages. And that would be a good thing.
my $0.02,
Mark
>
> Jim
>
> --
> @James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org> | Blessed Be!
> @ http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl!
> @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sgml-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
_____________________________________
Mark Johnson
Senior Lecturing Fellow
111 Physics Bldg., Box 90305
Department of Physics
Duke University
Durham, NC 27708-0305
(919) 660-2504 Fax: (919) 660-2525
Reply to: