Re: [SUMMARY] Divergance with LSB spec
Mark Johnson <mark@phy.duke.edu> writes:
> In the rationale for sec R001 of the spec
> (see http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/debian/sgml/bischoff/rationale/overr001.html)
> it is recommended that this structure be dropped. Since we're trying
> to stick to the spec wherever possible, I supppose we should drop
> support for this. Opinions?
Disagree. The LSB spec says we shouldn't ship the files that way, but
we're providing FPI->dir on a symlink basis only, and I don't see the
spec saying we can't do this at all.
In short, it's up to us, and I kinda like it, so I propose we keep
it.
> I say we can ignore notations for now.
Agree.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: