Re: [SUMMARY] Divergance with LSB spec
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
> >>"Mark" == Mark Johnson <mark@phy.duke.edu> writes:
>
> Mark> However, it sounds like psgml chokes on the CATALOG directive in the
> Mark> super-catalog:
>
> It may turn out that psgml does suppor the CATALOG
> directive. The problems are twofold:
> a) /etc/sgml/catalog contains an entry for /usr/lib/sgml/catalog,
> and that file happens to be a symlink to /etc/sgml/catalog. The
> resulting circular link is something that gives psgml pause
> (though when it runs out of space it does come back with an
> error).
This is a sgmltools-2 bug which should be fixed / flushed by the new
sgmltools-lite package, if not, someone needs to file an RC bugs. I
don't have any machines to test potato -> woody with anymore.
> b) The relative paths in /etc/sgml/transition.cat imply that the
> dtd's should be found in a subdir under /etc/sgml, which they
> obviously are not present in. A BASE directive, at least, is
> required, and I don't yet know if psgml supports base
> directives.
Yes, Ardo acknowledged this.
> Mark> http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/7085/0/5229979/
>
> Mark> Feedback is encouraged.
> Are you dropping support for the layout described in
> /usr/share/doc/sgml-base/sgml_layout.txt.gz ? I think dropping
> support would be a shame.
The FPI -> dir stuff? No, we're retaining that. I suggested
update-catalog should support this directly (the logic found in
sgml-data's sgml-catalog-check.pl .
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: