Re: "not implied"?
Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> writes:
> I am using nsgmls to validate a DocBook XML article. I notice that with the
> switch '-wxml' I get this:
>
> nsgmls -s -wxml /usr/pkg/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl/modular/dtds/decls/xml.dcl
> newsite_test.xml
>
> nsgmls:/usr/pkg/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl/modular/dtds/decls/xml.dcl:1:W:
> SGML declaration was not implied
Fixed in debian psgml mode in unstable.
> My gut feeling is that the 'SGML declaration was not implied' can be
> safely ignored, but is there a 'legal' to get rid of it? Or should I
> put up with it?
XML doesn't support the explicit setting of a declaration.
I would ignore it and/or wait for getting the new psgml.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: