Re: where is sdocbook-xml
- To: Holger Krug <hkrug@rationalizer.com>
- Cc: debian-sgml@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: where is sdocbook-xml
- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Date: 26 Feb 2001 14:54:52 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] oalmqtqkxf.fsf@arroz.fake>
- In-reply-to: <20010226183439.A14345@dev99.dev.adler.rationalizer.com>
- References: <20010226100145.A7388@dev99.dev.adler.rationalizer.com> <oan1b9s9nk.fsf@arroz.fake> <20010226172322.A13608@dev99.dev.adler.rationalizer.com> <oaae79s6s4.fsf@arroz.fake> <20010226183439.A14345@dev99.dev.adler.rationalizer.com>
Holger Krug <hkrug@rationalizer.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 12:17:31PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > There are definately a lot of holes in our XSL support.
>
> I see. We've done some thing for our own purpose.
>
> > I suggest you join the debian-sgml@lists.debian.org mailing list.
>
> Done. Thank you for the hint. We've made a docbook-xsl package for
> our own purposes, not knowing that the package is already there.
> The next time I'll read first.
Coordinate with the debian-sgml list. I am very interested in having
a complete XSL toolchain insofar as the tools are robust enough to
support it in Debian. It's a major weakness. We really need people
who actually use this in a production environment so we get it right.
What XSL processor are you using btw?
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: