Re: docbook-xml & centralized catalogs
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes:
> / Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com> was heard to say:
> | Thoughts? I know it's a little sketchy feeling to be moving catalogs
> | into the dir with entities and dtds, but I think it really is easier
> | to manage, closer to upstream, etc. And lets face it, upstream SGML
> | catalogs for specific SGML/XML packages are not really user
> | configuration files at all anyhow, are they?
>
> N.B. if you put a file called 'catalog' in a directory, you cannot
> prevent some SGML systems (e.g, SP and it's relatives) from using it
> if any SGML or XML file is opened from that directory.
I wonder if that's a problem for us. People should never be working
out of that directory.... OTOH perhaps you can never be too paranoid.
I don't know if we wanna try to standardize that catalog name -- seems
a bit silly / overreaching.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: