Re: packaging policy questions re new standard

[Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>]

Correcting myself:

Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com> writes:

> This is somewhat reasonable.  I don't feel all that strongly about,
> say, not having
> 
>    dtd/xml/slides-1.0
>    dtd/xml/slides-1.1
> 
> In fact, dtd/xml/slides-1.0 is actually closer to current Debian
> practice than what you proposed.  

I lied.  You'd think I would know my own packages.

I have 

  dtd/docbook-xml/
                  3.1.7
                  4.1.7

I think I also need to add:

  dtd/docbook-xml/
                  3.1    -symlink-> 3.1.7
                  3      -symlink-> 3.1.7
                  4.1    -symlink-> 4.1.7
                  4      -symlink-> 4.1.7

Is that accurate?  Mark, would that help for your docbook derivitives?

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>