Re: website.dtd
Quoting Mark Johnson <mark@phy.duke.edu>:
> My statement might've been misleading. In order to make "real debs" I would have to
> be a debian maintainer - which I am not.
>
> I'll apply for maintainership and see what happens.
That´s OK, please keep us informed here.
BTW I submitted a bug report to the Debian BTS for package WNPP
(Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) requesting the packaging
of the DocBook XSL stylesheets (Bug#77753). If you become an official
Debian maintainer you can adopt this package and close the bug.
Please allow me some observations regarding your current
docbook-website-17_1.7-2.deb:
- is it really necessary to include the version no. of website to the
subdirectory (/usr/lib/sgml/dtd/docbook-website-17/)?
I suggest to ommit the version no. completely _or_ put all v1.x
upstream files into a subdir "1.x" (like it is done for the official
docbook-xml deb).
- the same could be done for the XSL stylesheet files
- the catalog entry could contain entries like:
PUBLIC "-//Norman Walsh//DTD Website V1.8//EN" "dtd/docbook-website/1.8/website.dtd"
PUBLIC "-//Norman Walsh//DTD Website V1//EN" "dtd/docbook-website/1.8/website.dtd"
PUBLIC "-//Norman Walsh//DTD Website//EN" "dtd/docbook-website/1.8/website.dtd"
Maybe more experienced Debian (SGML) maintainers (Adam Di Carlo) could
tell us their opinion.
Michael
--
mw@miwie.in-berlin.de http://www.miwie.org
mw@miwie.org http://wap.miwie.org
Reply to: