GLeblanc@cu-portland.edu said:
> It's probably true that creating a DSSSL stylesheet for Linuxdoc
> wouldn't be all that complex, but I'm still a little troubled by the
> lack of a good text backend. I haven't seen any mass-migration of the
> LDP authors to DocBook yet, so I haven't really pushed to get
> something better than Lynx.
Does the term "chicken-and-egg problem" ring a bell?
There's a better backend-processing candidate for the text stuff (html2text,
IIRC), and it's even on the SourceForge SGMLtools-Lite project page as a bug
report that this must be implemented. I think that grabbing this bug would be
a more useful passtime than writing new stuff for Linuxdoc.
--
Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com <cg@cdegroot.com>
http://sgmltools-lite.sourceforge.net/
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD 1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B
Forge your CipherSaber and list it: http://www.xs4all.nl/~cg/ciphersaber/
Attachment:
pgpmztTttJvX7.pgp
Description: PGP signature